The U.S. Department of Commerce has finalized steep anti-dumping and countervailing tariffs on most solar cells imported from Southeast Asia, escalating a landmark trade case that has reshaped global solar supply chains and sparked sharp debate within the clean energy industry.
The decision, announced Monday, concludes a year-long investigation prompted by complaints from major U.S. solar manufacturers—including Korea’s Hanwha Qcells, Arizona-based First Solar Inc., and several smaller producers—who accused Chinese companies of circumventing trade rules by producing solar panels in Malaysia, Cambodia, Thailand, and Vietnam.
The petitioners, represented by the American Alliance for Solar Manufacturing Trade Committee, alleged that these Chinese-owned firms were flooding the U.S. market with panels priced below cost and buoyed by unfair government subsidies, thereby undermining billions of dollars in U.S. manufacturing investments.
“These are very strong results,” said Tim Brightbill, an attorney for the group, during a press briefing. “We are confident they will address the unfair trade practices of the Chinese-owned companies in these four countries, which have been injuring the U.S. solar manufacturing industry for far too long.”
The finalized tariff rates vary significantly by company and country, but most exceed preliminary duties announced last year. Jinko Solar’s Malaysian-made products will face a combined duty of 41.56%, among the lowest levied. In contrast, Trina Solar’s products from Thailand will be hit with a staggering 375.19% tariff.
Cambodian producers who declined to participate in the investigation will face punitive duties exceeding 3,500%.
The move follows growing concerns that Chinese firms have been using Southeast Asian factories to avoid existing U.S. trade restrictions. Imports from the four affected countries accounted for the majority of U.S. solar supply last year, totaling over $10 billion. In response to the trade case, imports from those nations have plummeted, while shipments from alternative sources like Laos and Indonesia are on the rise.
While proponents argue the tariffs are essential to level the playing field, critics warn they could backfire. The Solar Energy Industries Association (SEIA) contends that the tariffs may stifle domestic solar growth by increasing costs for U.S. panel assemblers, many of which rely on imported cells. These facilities have been expanding rapidly under incentives introduced in the 2022 Inflation Reduction Act.
SEIA officials did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
The final step in the process comes in June, when the U.S. International Trade Commission is scheduled to vote on whether the domestic solar industry has suffered material harm due to the alleged dumping and subsidies. A positive determination would cement the tariffs, potentially reshaping the landscape of the solar industry for years to come.
Related topics:
EU May Ease Methane Rules for U.S. LNG to Avert Trade Spat
Woodside Hires Sarah Bairstow to Lead Louisiana LNG Project
PDVSA Halts Chevron Oil Shipments Amid U.S. Sanctions Escalation